Hey Canada, it’s 2025. While the U.S. is taking off with tech unicorns, rockets, and booming startups, Canada is gazing wistfully at Europe’s slow, bureaucratic economic lounge. Spoiler alert: that club’s got a heavy dress code of sky-high taxes, choking regulations, and sluggish innovation—and it doesn’t suit us.

Now let’s take a look at today’s sponsor:

Want to stay ahead of the markets without spending hours reading?

Elite Trade Club gives you the top stories, trends, and insights — all in one quick daily email.

It’s everything you need to know before the bell in under 5 minutes.

Join for free and get smarter about the markets every morning.

Click Here to Join Now

Europe operates like a turtle dragging a backpack loaded with welfare costs, regulations, and taxes, expected to win a race against America’s supersonic jet of entrepreneurship, venture capital, and flexible labor. Canada flirting with Europe’s model means slower GDP growth, fewer startups, and weaker job creation.

Meanwhile, the U.S. model has powered Silicon Valley and thousands of startups that flood global markets with innovation and employment. Europe’s pride? Spotify. That’s it.

Startups in Europe often slog through a swamp of red tape before they even get off the ground. The U.S. offers billions in venture capital and far less regulatory drag, giving entrepreneurs the freedom to launch, grow, and disrupt rapidly.

Canada needs to shed burdensome regulations and invoke a culture of risk-taking and innovation if it wants to keep pace.

High European taxes drain resources from businesses and investors alike. When Canada leans into that system, it loses the crucial investment capital needed to fund new ideas, technologies, and expansion.

Keeping taxes lower like in the American model means more money stays in entrepreneurs’ wallets to grow the economy and create jobs.

It’s tempting to admire Asia’s efficiency and innovation — Japan, South Korea, China seem like tech powerhouses overnight. But those countries have huge populations and massive domestic markets to sustain their models.

Canada’s population, under 42 million, can’t mimic those economies without scale. Instead, Canada should adopt the nimble, entrepreneurial American approach—perfect for a mid-sized, innovation-driven market.

Don’t waste time or money on slow-growth economies and industries bogged down by bureaucracy. Look for innovation-led sectors driving real progress and job creation.

Canada’s allure to Europe’s welfare-heavy, high-tax model means sacrificing growth and opportunity. Economically, growth-oriented policies paying dividends in the U.S. are the smarter bet.

Where’s the next big thing? In startups, technological advances, and scattered entrepreneurial hubs powered by ample venture capital, not in tightly regulated markets with crushing tax burdens.

Canada needs to dump Europe’s heavy, slow bureaucratic baggage and embrace America’s model of lower taxes, minimal red tape, flexible labor, and rapid innovation. Until then, Canadians will keep waiting for growth, jobs, and a prosperous future that never quite arrives.

Q: Why shouldn’t Canada follow Europe’s model?
A: Because Europe’s model includes high taxes, excessive regulations, and slower economic growth which aren’t sustainable for Canada’s defined population and ambitions.

Q: Can Canada learn from Asia?
A: Yes, but Asia benefits from massive populations and markets Canada doesn't have. The U.S. model suits Canada’s size and innovation goals better.

Q: Why is the American model better for growth?
A: It has lower taxes, less regulatory drag, and abundant venture capital that stimulates entrepreneurial risk-taking and job creation.