UK Hate Speech Laws Are Out of Control — And Canada Could Be Next in Line

Alright, folks — gather ‘round, because the Motherland of freedom of speech is serving up a fresh cup of irony, extra bitter. But first a word from our sponsor:

When the founder who sold his last company to Zillow for $120M starts a new venture, people notice. That’s why the same VCs who backed Uber, Venmo, and eBay also invested in Pacaso.

Disrupting the real estate industry once again, Pacaso’s streamlined platform offers co-ownership of premier properties, revamping the $1.3T vacation home market.

And it works. By handing keys to 2,000+ happy homeowners, Pacaso has already made $110M+ in gross profits in their operating history.

Now, after 41% YoY gross profit growth last year alone, they recently reserved the Nasdaq ticker PCSO.

Invest for $2.90/Share

_{Paid advertisement for Pacaso’s Regulation A offering. Read the offering circular at invest.pacaso.com. Reserving a ticker symbol is not a guarantee that the company will go public. Listing on the NASDAQ is subject to approvals.}

The UK — birthplace of Shakespeare, the Magna Carta, and passive-aggressive tea service — has decided that the path to social harmony is policing language with UK hate speech laws that keep getting wider than a British breakfast plate.

Under the noble banner of “protecting vulnerable communities,” Britain keeps stretching the definition of hate speech like it’s in some Olympic flexibility competition. Sure, it started with stopping genuinely dangerous incitement — fair enough — but now you can land on the police radar for things that are still offensive but legal. Congratulations, Britain — you’ve successfully invented pre-crime for hurt feelings.

The magic phrase? “Likely to cause alarm, harassment, or distress.” Translation: if someone’s feelings get paper-cut level hurt, the speech police might come knocking. And guess what?

The Online Safety Act UK has big tech platforms scrubbing the internet cleaner than a Victorian fever ward. Lawful speech? Deleted, just in case. Want to criticize immigration policy, question Parliament, or poke fun at a certain Prime Minister? Careful — you might get flagged as extremist before you’ve even hit “post.”

Supporters claim it’s about safety and minority protection. Critics — and let’s be honest, anyone who likes a good argument — say it’s replacing Britain’s lively public square with a padded room where speech must be certified Government-Approved Nice™.

Now, to my Canadian friends feeling smug: Canada could be next.

Your Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Section 2(b)) promises freedom of expression, but Section 319 of the Criminal Code of Canada already bans hate speech targeting “identifiable groups.” Sound familiar? That’s because your system mirrors the UK legal framework.

Right now, your courts act like a goalie, blocking most bad shots against free expression. But lawmakers are already dabbling with “safe zones” for protests, online regulation talk, and broader speech restriction trends. It’s like the UK is the preview and Canada’s just waiting for opening night.

We’ve already seen Ottawa talk digital regulation “for safety,” which should set off alarm bells for anyone who’s read the fine print on Britain’s online censorship.

Remember — political trends travel across the Atlantic faster than The Beatles in ’64. When Canada free speech restrictions follow the UK model, you’ll see social media censorship, hate speech prosecutions, and maybe even “politeness quotas” in political debate.

So here’s your wake-up call: defend real, messy, sometimes-offensive free expression now, or prepare to nod politely while the state hands you your new approved vocabulary list.

If you want fearless reporting that actually talks about UK policing speech, Canada hate speech laws, and the creeping expansion of extremism definitions — subscribe to the CanAmerica News newsletter right now.

Because one day soon, this might be the only place you can still read words like this.